Gas-operated firearms have been in use for over a century, providing reliable and efficient operation for military, law enforcement, and civilian users. The gas system of a firearm is responsible for cycling the action, extracting and ejecting spent cartridges, and loading new rounds from the magazine. While traditional gas systems have proven their effectiveness, recent advancements in technology have led to the development of adjustable gas pistons, such as the KNS Adjustable Gas Piston. In this article, we will compare the KNS Adjustable Gas Piston to traditional gas systems, exploring their features, benefits, and drawbacks.

Traditional Gas Systems

Traditional gas systems, also known as direct impingement systems, have been the standard for many firearms, including the iconic AR-15 rifle. In a direct impingement system, gas from the fired cartridge is directed through a port in the barrel, into a gas tube, and back into the receiver. The gas pressure then acts on a bolt carrier group, cycling the action.

The KNS Adjustable Gas Piston

The KNS Adjustable Gas Piston is a modern alternative to traditional gas systems, offering several advantages over its counterparts. The adjustable gas piston design operates on the principle of redirecting gas pressure to cycle the action, similar to traditional systems. However, it incorporates a piston that pushes against the bolt carrier group, rather than relying on gases directly impinging on the bolt carrier.

Comparison and Considerations

When comparing the KNS Adjustable Gas Piston to traditional gas systems, there are several factors to consider. One of the main considerations is the intended use of the firearm. For military or law enforcement applications, where reliability and simplicity are paramount, traditional gas systems may still be the preferred choice. The proven track record and widespread availability of spare parts and accessories can also be significant factors. 

 However, for civilian shooters or those looking for greater control and customization, the KNS Adjustable Gas Piston from Lead and Steel offers several advantages. 

Firstly, the adjustable nature of the KNS system allows users to fine-tune the gas flow to their specific needs. This can be particularly useful for those shooting suppressed or using different ammunition types. By adjusting the gas flow, shooters can optimize their firearm’s performance, reducing recoil and muzzle rise, and improving overall accuracy.

Secondly, the KNS Adjustable Gas Piston is known for its reliability. The design minimizes fouling and carbon buildup, resulting in cleaner operation and reduced maintenance requirements. This can be especially beneficial for high-volume shooters or those participating in competitive shooting events.

Additionally, the KNS system is compatible with a wide range of AR-15 platforms, making it a versatile choice for those who own multiple rifles or want to upgrade an existing firearm. The ease of installation and compatibility with existing parts and accessories can save time and money compared to switching to a completely different gas system.

Lastly, the KNS Adjustable Gas Piston offers the advantage of reduced felt recoil. By controlling the amount of gas used to cycle the action, shooters can experience smoother and more controllable recoil impulses. This can improve follow-up shot accuracy and overall shooting experience.

In conclusion, while traditional gas systems still have their merits for military and law enforcement applications, the KNS Adjustable Gas Piston provides civilian shooters with greater control, customization, reliability, and reduced recoil. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the shooter.


The development of the KNS Adjustable Gas Piston has introduced a new option for firearm users, offering adjustability and cleaner operation compared to traditional gas systems. While traditional gas systems remain the standard for many applications, the KNS Adjustable Gas Piston can provide significant benefits for those seeking improved performance and versatility. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences, intended use, and the specific firearm in question.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *